News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results. Parent comment

Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by purplefox on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @11:58AM (#3949134)
Yes indeed. You can mix and match Java, JavaScript, Ruby and Groovy in the same app. We hope to support more languages going ahead (e.g. Java, Scala, ...)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by eropple on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @01:46PM (#3949666)
Once you get Scala, I'll be heading your way. :-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by orefalo on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @06:00PM (#3950696)
You already have Scala+Async IO+Netty, it's called play framework 2.0

http://www.playframework.org/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by eropple on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @08:30PM (#3951240)
I've used it. Not a fan of many (most) of their design decisions, though it's better than the current alternatives.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by rabbitfang on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @02:25PM (#3949856)
+1 for Scala

Might be nice to also see a FAQ about the differences between vert.x and Play 2

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by purplefox on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @04:07PM (#3950228)
Hopefully Scala won't be too long :)
[ Parent | on HN ]