>It's a similar argument over whether or not gun manufacturers
This is really only a debate in the US and only because it's directly written in the constitution. Pretty much no other product works that way.
This is really only a debate in the US and only because it's directly written in the constitution. Pretty much no other product works that way.
Nah, I think it's a disagreement over whether a tool's maker gets blamed for evil use or the tool's user.
It's a similar argument over whether or not gun manufacturers should have any liability for their products being used for murder.