Re:Google to pause Gemini image generation of people after i...
by commandlinefan on Thursday February 22, 2024 @11:23AM
(#39469377)
Everybody seems to be focusing on the actual outcome while ignoring the more disconcerting meta-problem: how in the world _could_ an AI have been trained that would produce a black Albert Einstein? What was it even trained _on_? This couldn't have been an accident, the developers had to have bent over backwards to make this happen, in a really strange way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google to pause Gemini image generation of people after i...
by lolinder on Thursday February 22, 2024 @11:27AM
(#39469439)
This isn't very surprising if you've interacted much with these models. Contrary to the claims in the various lawsuits, they're not just regurgitating images they've seen before, they have a good sense of abstract concepts and can pretty easily combine ideas to make things that have never been seen before.
This type of behavior has been evident ever since DALL-E's horse-riding astronaut [0]. There's no training image that resembles it (the astronaut even has their hands in the right position... mostly), it's combining ideas about what a figure riding a horse looks like and what an astronaut looks like.
Changing Albert Einstein's skin color should be even easier.
[0] https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/06/1049061/dalle-op...
Re:Google to pause Gemini image generation of people after i...
by mpweiher on Thursday February 22, 2024 @11:32AM
(#39469501)
> Contrary to the claims in the various lawsuits, they're not just regurgitating images they've seen before,
I don't think "just" is what the lawsuits are saying. It's the fact that they can regurgitate a larger subset (all?) of the original training data verbatim. At some point, that means you are copying the input data, regardless of how convoluted the tech underneath.
Re:Google to pause Gemini image generation of people after i...
by lolinder on Thursday February 22, 2024 @11:38AM
(#39469575)
Fair, I should have said something along the lines of "contrary to popular conception of the lawsuits". I haven't actually followed the court documents at all, so I was actually thinking of discussions in mainstream and social media.