News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Subversion does not suck by silentbicycle on Thursday December 11, 2008 @02:41PM (#394680)
Calm down. :) I never said that subversion's interface is great(?!), I just said that designers often find some tools programmers use ridiculously ugly and unnecessarily complicated. I think they have a valid point, and when programmers write them off, they often lose valuable feedback. (If a relatively simple tool is as annoying to configure as procmail, for example, somebody screwed up badly. IMHO.)

I use Mercurial, but I don't have any grand illusions about its interface being ideal. It works well enough for me, though. (I don't like svn either; tracking changes on a file-by-file basis isn't usually the right abstraction for the way I work.) DCVSs are relatively new, as somebody else pointed out, and in time they will probably have better interfaces.

Re:Why Subversion does not suck by mechanical_fish on Thursday December 11, 2008 @02:54PM (#394697)
designers often find some tools programmers use ridiculously ugly and unnecessarily complicated

Yeah, that must be why so many of them use no version control at all...

I agree that the VCS to use is the one that your designer is willing to use. I just think that there's no reason why designers should necessarily want to use Subversion over a DVCS... except that, as a more mature tool, Subversion has a better selection of interface alternatives and a larger installed base.

Re:Why Subversion does not suck by silentbicycle on Thursday December 11, 2008 @02:59PM (#394707)
"I think we are in violent agreement." (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ViolentAgreement)