News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SN Pro Typeface by latexr on Thursday February 22, 2024 @08:27AM (#39466720)
How are arrows and circular numbers markdown features? They’re not part of the language. Maybe the checkmark would be justified, for checklists, but even then an x is clearer and it’s not like you can’t do proper checkmarks with other fonts. Or arrows, for that matter.
Re:SN Pro Typeface by alexb_ on Thursday February 22, 2024 @08:37AM (#39466835)
Markdown has numbered lists, checkboxes, and bullet points - having ligatures that look better w/ those are not crazy.
Re:SN Pro Typeface by latexr on Thursday February 22, 2024 @08:51AM (#39467025)
> numbered lists

Do we know that that’s how the circular numbers are used? They don’t say. Personally I’d dislike that in my numbered lists, but I’m sure others would like it.

> checkboxes

Again, I doubt those checkmarks are clearer than an x. But again, I can see how some people would prefer those. That’s not nothing new to this font, though.

> and bullet points

Where are the bullet points in that example? I don’t see a bullet symbol.

> having ligatures

Ligatures are useful for none of those examples. And it’s not even clear if that’s how they work, since they specifically and exclusively mention ligatures for arrows, not the other symbols. Furthermore, they specifically mention (emphasis mine) “improving support for Markdown and ligatures” meaning those are separate features.

> that look better w/ those are not crazy.

Who called it crazy? Please don’t straw man, I’m not arguing there’s something wrong with adding those features, I’m asking how they relate to writing markdown. Which they mention but haven’t explained. How, specifically, is writing markdown improved by using this font?