News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iMessage with PQ3 Cryptographic Protocol by tsunamifury on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @11:12AM (#39455638)
I worked on several integration attempts between Apple and Google.

They often presented specs that clearly showed security holes then simply would deny they were there or say “that’s secure”. It was a truly wild experience.

Re:iMessage with PQ3 Cryptographic Protocol by kergonath on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @04:35PM (#39459887)
This sounds fascinating, you really should write about this.
Re:iMessage with PQ3 Cryptographic Protocol by tsunamifury on Friday February 23, 2024 @01:10PM (#39484100)
I'm following up here just because of your comment. I've thought about this often but I've run into a few problems:

1) This tier of work is roundly invisible to almost everyone in the field. Many in the field are so confident in their knowledge of 'how things work.' that they simply can't accept the real 'in the room' realities of whats going on. Often engineers most of all, who are often deceived by their executives on the real goals. Are you and eng? Have you ever had that feeling of being gaslit by your VP? Yea you probably were, and you didn't know why.

2) Even at that level, I had a limited picture and a good extrapolation of what was going on in other rooms, but nothing I can say fully factually

3) No one wants to know. People love the just-so stories of these companies and really genuinely seem to get hurt/be in denial when they are faced with the reality that they are made up of ultra-selfish, shark like people with very little invested in the consumer, the company, or really anyone else. It's a game played to win for personal satisfaction. I've found that most people, simply cannot accept this.