Re:Kagi Sidekick (alpha)
by thrownaway163 on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @05:11AM
(#39452029)
As someone who in a past life spent loads of time doing of SEO I cannot help but find this argument flawed.
So, we shouldn’t penalize low quality, SEO, spam because of people’s wants? I do want them to penalize those sites because they are a disservice and more often than not crappy, unsecured WordPress that drowns out those that are not spam.
Thank you Kagi team! A shame how far Google’s results have fallen.
Edit: also SEO is one of the more seedier parts of the software industry. Tons of unaware small businesses conned into these awful, low quality sites. I literally quit because it was so morally bankrupt.
Re:Kagi Sidekick (alpha)
by Repulsion9513 on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @09:51PM
(#39462583)
What is the goal of search? Isn't it to deliver the results that people want to see from their query? So... yeah.
> they are a disservice and more often than not crappy, unsecured WordPress that drowns out those that are not spam
What does that have to do with "reputable businesses making a quality product" as my comment said?
In fact, I would rather they not get penalized for it, since low-quality SEO content is a good way to show up in certain other search engines (Google), and every business wants to show up in Google, making that content quite common even from reputable businesses making a quality product.