Re:Faculty group calls on Yale to make teaching 'distinct fr...
by kelseyfrog on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @04:37PM
(#39447274)
I must be missing something; doesn't everyone already think their biases are the right biases?
Re:Faculty group calls on Yale to make teaching 'distinct fr...
by shadowgovt on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @05:25PM
(#39447823)
Generally. But some people are correct in that opinion and some are incorrect.
We can fool ourselves frequently. Nature cannot be fooled.
Re:Faculty group calls on Yale to make teaching 'distinct fr...
by kelseyfrog on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @09:05PM
(#39449385)
I'm not convinced.
Homo sapiens have had access to nature for 160,000 years. We've spent a lot of time thinking we've folded nature when we had no right to. Why should I think now is any different?
Re:Faculty group calls on Yale to make teaching 'distinct fr...
by shadowgovt on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @11:47PM
(#39450255)
if one believes in objective reality, it stands to reason that it is possible for a person to believe things that match to that reality and it is possible for a person to believe things that do not match to that reality.
My claim is we should bias towards believing things that match to reality. Seeking "unbias" is seeking ignorance.
Re:Faculty group calls on Yale to make teaching 'distinct fr...
by kelseyfrog on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @07:29PM
(#39461573)
I've given up that people are capable of understanding basic concepts like operationalization let alone identify when and where they are doing it in their day to day life. The closer someone positions themselves as a rationalist, the further they are from understanding how they are participating in the collective action of coloring reality with their biases.
It might be theoretically possible for people to inch toward objective reality, I've never seen it work in practice. It's a failed ideology and for some reason folks believe that this, the millionth time, it's going to work.
Eliminating bias is a mu-goal. An unbiased electrical pin isn't a perfect signal; it's a floating input, passing along whatever radio flux slips through it. Our goal is always to seek out the right biases.