News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Coursera/Stanford online algorithms I course – a retrospe... by lawnchair_larry on Tuesday May 08, 2012 @01:01PM (#3944604)
You shouldn't be grading then. They are not taking a class in Paying Attention, they are taking a class in algorithms. If they know the material, that is what matters. I also cannot stand this practice.
Re:Coursera/Stanford online algorithms I course – a retrospe... by aplusbi on Tuesday May 08, 2012 @04:16PM (#3945591)
And people who know the material should be able to answer those questions without any difficulty. What's the problem?
Re:Coursera/Stanford online algorithms I course – a retrospe... by sesqu on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @12:45AM (#3947138)
I'm assuming the problem is questions like this:

  Recall the Master Method and its three parameters a,b,d. Which of the following is the best interpretation of b^d, in the context of divide-and-conquer algorithms?
Alternatively, the problem might be questions that ask for the state of an algorithm at some point, when the algorithm can be correctly implemented in different ways and one is expected to recall/go back and check the exact implementation used.
Re:Coursera/Stanford online algorithms I course – a retrospe... by aplusbi on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @10:39AM (#3948771)
Those kind of questions should be taken out back and put out of their misery, but I don't think there's anything to suggest that adestefan was asking those kinds of questions.
Re:Coursera/Stanford online algorithms I course – a retrospe... by jonsen on Tuesday May 08, 2012 @01:54PM (#3944951)
Yeah, look to Bjarne Stroustrup, he gave all of us C++, no questions asked.