News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Basic proxy implementation using io_uring. Parent comment

Re:Basic proxy implementation using io_uring by rogers12 on Sunday February 18, 2024 @02:50AM (#39417073)
You should go back and add error handling to your C programs
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Basic proxy implementation using io_uring by userbinator on Sunday February 18, 2024 @02:56AM (#39417104)
Are you implying I don't already have error handling?

Personal insults are not acceptable here.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Basic proxy implementation using io_uring by verticalscaler on Sunday February 18, 2024 @05:28AM (#39417907)
My dude, how would he know better? It is a perfectly fair assumption given the average C code base. Those numbers are unusually succinct.

You sound like you really know what you're doing, if you can, please share some of this for our edification and don't take things personally.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Basic proxy implementation using io_uring by znpy on Sunday February 18, 2024 @08:07AM (#39418727)
> Are you implying I don't already have error handling?

With baseless claims, no code, no other consideration? I would not imply that, I would assume that.

[ Parent | on HN ]