Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho...
by s1artibartfast on Saturday February 17, 2024 @11:01AM
(#39410624)
Fundamental research, like what a grant would pay for, is a fairly tiny part of what pharma companies do. The vast majority is the development. Modern drugs take ~$1.5 billion dollars to bring to market. In my experience, 99% of that cost comes after what looks like academic research.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho...
by sudosysgen on Saturday February 17, 2024 @01:28PM
(#39411983)
The fact that it's a tiny part of what pharma companies do is why there is a disconnect. There is something like 70 billion in grants alone (so not even including salaries and stipends a lot of the time) going towards biomedical fundamental research, and it's disconnected from the price signals because pharma companies will never be the ones doing it. It's still a necessary part of the process.
So for the market it looks like 99% of the cost comes after academic research but in reality that's only 40-60% of it.
At the end of the day the price signal doesn't even reach most of the ressources and it is itself a poor proxy for the metric we actually want to optimize, which would be something like QALY.