News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho... by aknfffn on Saturday February 17, 2024 @02:22AM (#39407204)
The moral dilemma is profiting from disease and the ill-health of a population.

The only argument against publicly funded drug production is that profit seeking is more efficient and the societal outcome is improved by not funding a public body to do this.

As other comments highlight, not only do societies publicly fund research (eg C19), they provide a legal system that protects monopoly profits, and won’t use single-payer bargaining on price…

So when pharmaceuticals then drop more cash on executives and shareholders it’s natural to question turning Covid19, cancer, or obesity etc into a profit centre for the wealthiest in society

Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho... by carlosjobim on Saturday February 17, 2024 @03:08AM (#39407465)
Profiting from hunger, those pesky cooks. Profiting from people freezing, those deplorable tailors...
Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho... by supertimor on Saturday February 17, 2024 @05:09PM (#39414004)
Lol, how many multi-millionaire/billionaire chefs and tailors do you know?
Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho... by carlosjobim on Saturday February 17, 2024 @07:04PM (#39414749)
How many billionaire pharmacists do you know? If you extrapolate from chefs, you have farmers and then you have Bill Gates profiting from hunger.
Re:Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockho... by aknfffn on Saturday February 17, 2024 @08:47PM (#39415337)
Straw man. I pointed out that publicly provided may be more efficient, my argument wasn’t whether profit seeking is universally bad