The “quotes” you gave are totally and utterly unrelated to anything GP said.

It's been the general gist of America ever since Trump stood for election, and before that, it was the ""Terrorists"".

Now I guess there's also China.

Your observation is just that conflict exists in the world and it seems to have existed at many times in the past. Of course you can state that fact with an aura of mystery and intrigue, but it’s plainly obvious and not that interesting.

It's not just conflict, those are "boogeymen"

No you don't get it. Splitting your enemies this way is not the same as saying "us good, them bad". First you would not say anything about your intentions and how you are at all.

Example: The way Putin has dealt with opposition within his own country was not to say how great his party was and how bad the others were. It was to financially support some of the opposition group, arrest others, invite other publically, have others beaten up by thugs and have it change by the day. This way they can't trust what's real anymore, they lose hope not because there is none, but because it isn't clear what even to hope for and whom to hope with.

In the same time his party just is and wins by being in comparison more or less a clear, safe and before all known position to bet on — the devil that you know and all that.

So the confusion, the contradiction is the goal. That's why Tucker gets invited and Navalny murdered shortly after.