The $2 million penalty clause

Re:The $2 million penalty clause by jamess on Thursday December 11, 2008 @12:31AM (#394001)

Ha! A wonderful example of why we have laws regarding unfair contract terms. I can't believe they found a lawyer either ignorant or optimistic enough to put this in. The remedy is out of all proportion with the injury (which, as far as I can tell is non-existent) so the contract is unenforceable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The $2 million penalty clause by noonespecial on Thursday December 11, 2008 @05:03AM (#394173)

I can't believe they found a lawyer either ignorant or optimistic enough to put this in.

I sure can. My only question is: Did he bite his pinky while adding the clause and pronounce it "meeeelion"?

Its strange to think that, as a lawyer, you can write a 'program' in legalese to run on 'the legal system' and collect your pay without ever having to run it. Your client finds out later (much) if it will run or not! Wish my code worked that way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The $2 million penalty clause by muerdeme on Thursday December 11, 2008 @02:33AM (#394102)

The $2MM liquidated damages clause may indeed be a penalty, but clause would then just disappear. Either way it wouldn't affect the validity of the rest of the contract.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The $2 million penalty clause by jjs on Thursday December 11, 2008 @01:58AM (#394070)

On top of that, it's cheaper to fight it in court than to settle! :)

[ Parent | on HN ]