News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uv: Python packaging in Rust by aidos on Thursday February 15, 2024 @03:51PM (#39388634)
If all they did right now was leave Ruff exactly as it was and walk away they would have given the Python community a great gift.

Sure, it’s rendered a bunch of projects obsolete, but it’s because it’s so much better than the predecessors.

Re:Uv: Python packaging in Rust by anze3db on Thursday February 15, 2024 @04:01PM (#39388794)
If they stop development on Ruff today, Ruff won't be useful anymore after a few new Python releases. If the maintainers of the tools that Ruff is replacing stop maintaining them, the whole Python community will be in a really bad place. So, there is reason to be cautious. Astral being transparent on how they plan to make money would be very helpful.
Re:Uv: Python packaging in Rust by aidos on Thursday February 15, 2024 @04:13PM (#39388953)
I do get the caution, but I think that even in that case there’s enough momentum behind Ruff for the community to fork and carry on.

Obviously it would be pretty crummy to end up in a situation like pyright where MS really have leant in to their embrace, extend, extinguish strategy.

Re:Uv: Python packaging in Rust by the_mitsuhiko on Thursday February 15, 2024 @04:59PM (#39389668)
> If they stop development on Ruff today, Ruff won't be useful anymore after a few new Python releases

That is true for every single development tool in the Python space.

Re:Uv: Python packaging in Rust by theLiminator on Thursday February 15, 2024 @06:11PM (#39390584)
People could just fork it if that happens. Since the foundation of the tooling is solid, I 'm sure the community would rally around a fork that keeps it going.