Re:Why is Common Lisp not the most popular programming langu...
by CyberDildonics on Thursday February 15, 2024 @11:27AM
(#39384695)
Linked lists in their basic form are essentially obsolete. Having small items linked by pointers on a modern computer means following the pointer, allocation and deallocation are all more expensive than using data.
This sounds like a backwards rationalization without a technical explanation. Why would a linked list be any better for 'exploratory' programming? The vast majority of data structures are arrays, hash maps and occasionally a sorted map for the times where you need to insert something in a specific place.
What scenario is a linked list valuable in 'exploratory' programming where it wouldn't make more sense to use a different basic data structure?
This sounds like a backwards rationalization without a technical explanation. Why would a linked list be any better for 'exploratory' programming? The vast majority of data structures are arrays, hash maps and occasionally a sorted map for the times where you need to insert something in a specific place.
What scenario is a linked list valuable in 'exploratory' programming where it wouldn't make more sense to use a different basic data structure?