News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ... by lIl-IIIl on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @04:12PM (#39375457)
There's also a anti-proton which has a negative charge. I think this is probably the smallest charge there is.

A neutron can decay into a proton, electron, and anti-neutrino. So maybe one way to think of it is that a proton is a neutron that is missing an electron, that's why it has the opposite charge of the electron.

Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ... by wiml on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @04:27PM (#39375668)
The quarks that make up a proton (or neutron, etc) have charges that are multiples of 1/3 the electron charge. So in one sense that is the real unit charge. But because as far as we know quarks can never exist in isolation we can only ever see particles with multiples of the electronic charge.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ... by a_gnostic on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @05:36PM (#39376535)
The number assigned to charge is an arbitrary convention. You could assign quarks with full numbered charges, instead of fractions, but you'd have to rework and recalculate all of physics and chemistry to get the new values right, and that's just too much work.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ... by calamari4065 on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @06:10PM (#39376896)
No matter what arbitrary value you assign to the electric charge, quarks will always be 1/3 of that. That's the problem in question, not the absolute value.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ... by twic on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @08:15PM (#39377951)
So quarks have a charge of 2 or -1, and a two of the former and one of the latter make a proton, which therefore has charge 3. An electron is elementary, but also has charge 3. The question is: that seems like a weird coincidence, how come it's like that?