News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book authors. Parent comment

Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut... by Animats on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:37AM (#39367159)
"This really isn't clear because cognition is treated as a special exception to copyright."

Actually, no. It's considered a transformative use. If you memorize a copyrighted play or piece of music and then perform in in public, that's a copyright violation. It's the literalness of the copy that matters.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut... by throwaway09223 on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @02:11AM (#39367315)
No, that's totally incorrect, we do not consider every observation a "transformative use" as applied to the human mind. If you memorize a copyrighted play and write another play it is NOT inherently a copyright violation of everything which has come before. We just don't do that.

The new play is judged as to its originality.

People who have seen a play (everybody) are allowed to write new plays which aren't beholden to the copyright of the first play they've ever watched.

[ Parent | on HN ]