Re:I applied for a SW role at FedEx and had to take this biz...
by lmm on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @12:31AM
(#39354789)
If getting on with your job when a customer has left $0.02 on the counter would be such a severe violation of your principles, you're likely unsuitable for jobs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I applied for a SW role at FedEx and had to take this biz...
by yvan-eht-nioj on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @06:59AM
(#39356853)
The question is hypothetical rather than practical, and in many roles (civil service, accountancy, law) demonstrated principles are a fundamental requirement.
The premise of the manager's hypothetical question was to determine whether someone is dishonest, which is flawed.
Re:I applied for a SW role at FedEx and had to take this biz...
by AndrewKemendo on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @02:15PM
(#39361527)
As someone who has hired 100+ people over the years, Iām choosing the principled person over the unprincipled one every single time
Re:I applied for a SW role at FedEx and had to take this biz...
by lupire on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @04:01PM
(#39362781)
I hire people with reasonable principles. Understanding transaction costs and personal responsibility is a principle.
Rigid, extreme fundamentalists with over-simplified principles are not good employees.