Neither of those people are a good source on the common definition of free markets. "Free market" is just two words, they can mean whatever an author wants. But it's useful to have a common vocabulary, and respectful to stick with the definition used by whomever introduces a term.

> I will add that I consider the very idea of "absence of the state" to be badly-formed, states vary considerably in their constitution but there's always something serving that role, even if it's a few elders in a village.