News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Benchmarking latency across common wireless links for microcontrollers. Parent comment

Re:Benchmarking latency across common wireless links for mic... by polishdude20 on Monday February 12, 2024 @12:03AM (#39341554)
What's the drawback of a 16 sample buffer over 128 samples?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmarking latency across common wireless links for mic... by utopcell on Monday February 12, 2024 @01:08AM (#39341967)
Longer buffers allow for jitter in processing further upstream. If you get a buffer every 0.6ms, you need to be able to process it always within 0.6ms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmarking latency across common wireless links for mic... by polishdude20 on Monday February 12, 2024 @09:32PM (#39353616)
Ah right that makes sense
[ Parent | on HN ]