Re:A look at the Mojo language for bioinformatics
by refulgentis on Sunday February 11, 2024 @07:19PM
(#39340185)
> He benchmarks against the rust implementation.
No he doesn't.
The post is Mojo for Bioinformatics.
They ran a completely different library, in a different language, on their machine.
They did not run anything in Mojo.
You are asserting one data point of a Rust bioinformatics library on a random machine contributes information about Mojo, and berating me about reading comprehension to cling to that.
> If this is...
"If this is your take-home from my post, it's pretty clear you didn't read it, or your reading comprehension needs some work. That sentence was obviously facetious, poking a little fun at the author of the original piece."
^ seriously, right back at you. With a wink, and hopeful understanding I'm saying subtly "relax partner." Your first reaction should be curiosity when you're confused, not name-calling.
No he doesn't.
The post is Mojo for Bioinformatics.
They ran a completely different library, in a different language, on their machine.
They did not run anything in Mojo.
You are asserting one data point of a Rust bioinformatics library on a random machine contributes information about Mojo, and berating me about reading comprehension to cling to that.
> If this is...
"If this is your take-home from my post, it's pretty clear you didn't read it, or your reading comprehension needs some work. That sentence was obviously facetious, poking a little fun at the author of the original piece."
^ seriously, right back at you. With a wink, and hopeful understanding I'm saying subtly "relax partner." Your first reaction should be curiosity when you're confused, not name-calling.