News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why it's impossible to agree on what's allowed by true_religion on Saturday February 10, 2024 @10:26AM (#39326790)
I went with anything that moves unpowered or not that is not also a living thing is a vehicle so long as it falls within the light cone that could theoretically be projected from the park grounds directly upwards if it were in a vacuum.

Not many people agreed with me, but it’s a strict rule that I could imagine something like the military trying to enforce over a top secret area.

It blocks everything ambiguous so only the horse was not a vehicle.

Overall I think it’s a good experiment as it shows why it’s good to enumerate examples of what is and isn’t part of a rule in order to adjusted it the future.

Re:Why it's impossible to agree on what's allowed by gifvenut on Saturday February 10, 2024 @04:22PM (#39330348)
Light cone? But over the park is not in the park.
Re:Why it's impossible to agree on what's allowed by wizardwes on Saturday February 10, 2024 @06:22PM (#39331214)
What is the vertical limit of the park? If I build a ramp and jump off it in a vehicle, at what point in its arc is the vehicle "in the park?"
Re:Why it's impossible to agree on what's allowed by saagarjha on Sunday February 11, 2024 @05:32AM (#39334042)
> so long as it falls within the light cone

I look forward to bring my vehicle by navigating through my 4D tessaract to a place where I could not have had the information of the rule.