News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Case for the Preservation of Abandoned Places by pfdietz on Friday February 09, 2024 @04:18PM (#39320668)
If age or historicity of something lends it value, then the government can pay to preserve that. It's not right to force a private owner to shoulder a cost that has a public benefit. Forcing the government to pay for it will cause the government to more properly balance costs and benefits.
Re:A Case for the Preservation of Abandoned Places by okr on Friday February 09, 2024 @08:17PM (#39322514)
Are you saying, government with tax payer money acts responsibly?
Re:A Case for the Preservation of Abandoned Places by pfdietz on Friday February 09, 2024 @09:59PM (#39323139)
Are you saying when they can impose burdens without cost to themselves, they won't abuse that shamefully?