I've just posted a comment criticising one of your other posts about this, but I feel now I need to clarify I don't think your entire post is irrational, just that it contains a few erroneous assumptions, and in at least one place fails to consider what I would deem a noteworthy concern.

I agree that most arguments in this area resembles tribal war more than rational debate, much like any discussion involving either trump or musk, where rationality is also thrown out the window in favour of signalling tribal affiliation

You justified it above as being useful for scammers and speculative investors.

It's rational to conclude the costs are not worth those supposed benefits.

Everything is useful for scammers. I don't know if crypto has significantly increased the rate of non-rich people being scammed.