> it’s not that i think they’re wrong, at all. it’s just that they add nothing new to the conversation, they’re superficial, and frequently don’t go on to give a reader any idea of how the decision worked out.

I dont know… we cant expect each article to expand on the previous article you read. i dont think article writers should scrap their article if it doesnt contribute some novel benefit. I think one additional article without new points simply emphasizes those existing points.

I mean, I get your fatigue. I just dont think there is any fault here.