News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Baruch Spinoza and the art of thinking in dangerous times by splintercell on Thursday February 08, 2024 @05:19PM (#39308571)
Are Upanishads pantheists or panantheists?
Re:Baruch Spinoza and the art of thinking in dangerous times by comonoid on Thursday February 08, 2024 @05:31PM (#39308695)
Upantheists.
Re:Baruch Spinoza and the art of thinking in dangerous times by midiguy on Thursday February 08, 2024 @08:56PM (#39310498)
Interpretations of the Vedas vary widely. Name any 'eism' and you will find groups of Hindus adhering to it.
Re:Baruch Spinoza and the art of thinking in dangerous times by kragen on Friday February 09, 2024 @03:25AM (#39312674)
they're books, not people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upanishads

espinoza didn't have access to them directly (he didn't speak sanskrit, and nobody had yet translated them into any of the four languages he spoke) but of course the upanishads have influenced western thought indirectly since before classical times. the upanishads deeply shaping the worldviews of the gymnosophists and later of the romani people and, to a smaller extent, the medieval european philosophers whose learning derived from the islamic golden age. khayyam, who brought us a new conception of numbers, at least outwardly endorsed sufism, which has profound and well-known connections with vedic doctrines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu%E2%80%93Islamic_relation...

i'm not claiming that the flow of ideas was one-way, and because much of it happened before written history (which began rather late in india) or otherwise outside the written record (consider consultations with romani fortune-tellers today, and try to extrapolate to centuries before gutenberg) it's difficult to tell which direction each idea flowed. but clearly there was an enormous amount of philosophical interchange, and at least some of it