> Deng Xiaoping himself was Hakka, as were most of the the core CCP leadership until recently [0]
I’m going to not believe your source given how much wrong you’ve gotten already. But even if true, Chinese identity politics are more attuned to region than ethnicity. Southerners also were trusted because the KMT was heavily southern biased while the communists were the opposite. This is why the capital is in BJ and not NJ.
> Hakka is the primary language spoken in TW after Mandarin btw.
No no no. It is definitely Hokkien, a dialect of Min, which is the base dialect for Fujian.
> If you're a fellow Bay Area native, maybe visit Fremont or Richmond District in SF sometime and actually learn about us Asian subcommunities
Is that some kind of Asian American thing? You can learn plenty about Chinese ethnicities in China, why bother doing it in the states? Southern ethnicities are also over represented in overseas Chinese communities given the propensity of people from GD or FJ to go abroad, and then cultures kind of diverge a bit (another reason the CCP doesn’t trust GD/FJ).
Guang'an, the town he was born, was and is Hakka speaking, after the Hakka-Punti wars were lost by the Hakka.
> Chinese identity politics are more attuned to region than ethnicity
I can agree with that with the post 1970 generation. Deng Xiaoping and his ilk were from before that era, during the Long March.
> It is definitely Hokkien
Yes, Hokkien is prominent in TW but so is Hakka. Around 10% Hakka speaking based on the last census.
> Is that some kind of Asian American thing
Taiwanese (and HK) American specifically. Iykyk I guess. Hence why I equally smell shit from your response.
If that was the case, then Hakka wouldn't be so overrepresented within the CCP.
Deng Xiaoping himself was Hakka, as were most of the the core CCP leadership until recently [0]
Hakka is the primary language spoken in TW after Mandarin btw.
If you're a fellow Bay Area native, maybe visit Fremont or Richmond District in SF sometime and actually learn about us Asian subcommunities.
[0] - https://www.jstor.org/stable/654189