News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A record number of Americans can't afford rent. Parent comment

Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by lukas099 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:16PM (#39293674)
I'm not convinced remote work is better than the market solution from an environmental point of view. Seems like having people as densely concentrated as they can be is best from an environmental standpoint.

Remote is definitely better than the status quo of subsidized suburbs housing car commuters though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by rtz121 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:23PM (#39293769)
If we grind down humans into fine dust, we could fit trillions of people into San Francisco.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by sjwhevvvvvsj on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:30PM (#39293869)
This is a Y Combinator forum, don’t give them ideas, I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody is already shopping out that pitch deck and Sam A is opening his checkbook.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by lukas099 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:33PM (#39293913)
That would probably be great from an environmental standpoint.

Notice I didn't say that we should only look from the environmnental standpoint.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by buzzert on Thursday February 08, 2024 @03:28AM (#39299634)
> subsidized suburbs housing car commuters

Suburbs are subsidized? What do you mean?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A record number of Americans can't afford rent by lukas099 on Monday February 12, 2024 @02:29PM (#39349177)
They generate little value per acre. More acres = more infrastructure cost.

Look at the graph in this example @2:59: https://youtu.be/7Nw6qyyrTeI?si=BVi7PNEizNnQ7FKh&t=179

[ Parent | on HN ]