Re:States, including CA and NY, sign heat pump memorandum to...
by downWidOutaFite on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @11:13AM
(#39290301)
PG&E is charging you to pay for wildfire lawsuits and to bury power lines so that people can keep building cities in forests.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:States, including CA and NY, sign heat pump memorandum to...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @11:38AM
(#39290695)
They are also regulated to have a 10% profit margin, so that only way to increase revenue is to drive up costs year after year.
Re:States, including CA and NY, sign heat pump memorandum to...
by photonbeam on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @11:24AM
(#39290477)
The state should pay for that out of general taxes rather that shifting the economic incentives of power use
Re:States, including CA and NY, sign heat pump memorandum to...
by amluto on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @11:54AM
(#39290889)
IMO the state should have forced PG&E into liquidation, bought all the assets, and converted the whole mess to a public utility. It would surely take some time to learn how to operate PG&E’s disaster of a system, but it’s not as though PG&E can competently operate its own system right now.
Re:States, including CA and NY, sign heat pump memorandum to...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @12:35PM
(#39291481)
I hated this idea at the time, but have come around to it. Im fairly libertarian, but understand that competition is difficult for the power distribution network.
As much as I think the state is inefficient, a cost plus regulated monopoly is even worse. Municipal power companies in CA run $0.10-0.20 per kwh, while PG&E is $0.40-0.50 cents, and going up.