Hum... no. The GP is complaining that what is on the title is the equivalent of doing nothing at all.

Of course, there's an entire plan, with shorter term goals and ways to achieve them. With actionable steps, what is a huge change from most climate accords. The article just does a very bad work of citing those and not getting at any detail at all.

My solution to the problem of pollution, or to the problem of vaccuous promises by politicians which is what I pointed at?

You believe so and criticize it.

To do what? If nothing happens it wasn't worth it to point it it.

So apparently you care enough about this topic to complain were is your solutions than to add something useful to it?