Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by cpach on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:51AM
(#39287402)
Yeah, IMHO Debian feels much more dependable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by nuker on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:58AM
(#39287465)
Or Rocky for RPM diehards :)
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by lproven on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:08AM
(#39287549)
If one were an RPM diehard, then why not openSUSE?
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by nuker on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:21AM
(#39287656)
Good question. I saw the CentOS drama unfolding and Rocky was pitched as a replacement. They held the door so far :) (Hodor from Game of Thrones)
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by nuker on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:33AM
(#39287766)
“Rocky mirrors RHEL exactly, aiming to be a bug for bug compatible release with RHEL itself.”
Is openSUSE like this?
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by bclemens on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @09:57AM
(#39289308)
It is not. openSUSE is a very different distro, though it does use RPM packages.
SuSE Liberty Linux is, I believe: https://www.suse.com/products/suse-liberty-linux/
Re:Rocky Linux, Reflections on Three Years of Growth
by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:39PM
(#39293990)
No; the distinction is precisely if you want an RPM distro (which OpenSUSE is) or a RHEL-like distro (which it isn't).