> which makes all the discussion more appealing
I have never experienced AI making anything more appealing. YMMV. I also have no need to generate images.
> have you look at the size and quality of the code? It is enough small
I agree it is a very small code base, in that it does basically nothing. Not sure how I'm supposed to view this as a positive. As far as quality, it looks like pretty much all the other python code I've seen.
> One of the code reviewers is a top Python community participant though.
Cool.
We need it and for several reasons (e.g. security) we write it from scratch.
The use case for integrating Slack with ChatGPT is well known, so it is useful for several organizations. Enough.
Except it does things like augment the input prompts, and can perform additional action based on the outputs.
So no, I don't have a need for something as simple as a ChatGPT pass through.
You might get a better reaction if you weren't so defensive over a sub 500 LOC project.
I receive a good reaction though.
Yuk.
> One of the code reviewers is a top Python community participant though.
Double yuk.
Also, have you look at the size and quality of the code? It is enough small so that other people can fork and play with it without requiring a lot of knowledge.
One of the code reviewers is a top Python community participant though.