Re:The Perverse Policies That Fuel Wildfires
by jprival on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @06:44PM
(#39282537)
About 420 ppm, an increase of about 120 ppm in the past 100 years? This is a strange question since it is obvious that it’s heavily “looked into” and easy to look up, and simultaneously hard to figure out what rhetorical point is being made in asking people to cite it out of context.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Perverse Policies That Fuel Wildfires
by unnamed76ri on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @08:22PM
(#39283310)
0.04% vs 0.03%
Illustrates how silly the comment is that I was replying to.
Re:The Perverse Policies That Fuel Wildfires
by zamfi on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @11:45PM
(#39284594)
Huh?
There are plenty of systems where the difference between 0.04% and 0.03% is dramatic, after all it’s an increase of 30% — and what matters is not the paltry decimal representation but rather the effects.
For example: consider concentration of sodium in human blood. The normal range is 0.31%-0.33% by weight. By 0.4% you’re pretty much dead.
Or consider chromium, an essential trace element: the normal amount is practically infinitessimal, in blood it’s 0.0000007% by weight, approximately. But not enough and you end up with diabetes or cardiovascular disease.
“0.04% vs 0.03%” is not an effective takedown of global warming.