Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by tenpies on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:19PM
(#39277222)
Jurisdiction is crucial too.
The chances that a Western government will leave you alone during all of this are virtually zero.
Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:40PM
(#39277605)
The chances you'll do better elsewhere are worse, unless you're a warlord. I have looked at places off the map for the next 100 years for this purpose. Maybe I'm wrong, where would you go to be self sufficient and ungovernable outside the Western world?
Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by 36933 on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:08PM
(#39277020)
Where are these places?
Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by bmelton on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:16PM
(#39277165)
FEMA has a list somewhere, but IIRC, the top of it included places like Buffalo, a few cities in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ann Arbor. Established cities along the great lakes are supposedly best positioned, but I've seen reports indicating that the age of the cities' infrastructure was a weakness for basically every one of the supposed climate havens
Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by raisedbyninjas on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:15PM
(#39277152)
Climate havens, near the great lakes in the US.
Re:Oceans May Have Already Seen 1.7°C of Warming
by quonn on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @12:15PM
(#39277149)
Well, there are plenty of maps that show which areas will be impacted more than others.
When contraction occurs, if you’ve planned properly, it’ll be news you read about, not impact on your life.
TLDR Optimize for the expectation of persistent volatility.