What if the front one is only a small fraction of the thrust at the rear? Would that be enough to "clear the path". Surely it would cost some efficiency but it may beat he alternative
Re:Relativistic Spaceship
by timschmidt on Monday February 05, 2024 @10:14PM
(#39270346)
Whipple shields [1] don't weigh much, and don't involve negative acceleration of any kind.
Re:Relativistic Spaceship
by the_third_wave on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @08:43AM
(#39274077)
In other words the space-equivalent of a supercavitating torpedo like the Shkval [1], more or less an underwater rocket which creates its own gas bubble around the projectile by deflecting part of the exhaust stream to nozzles on the front of the device.
Re:Relativistic Spaceship
by cooper_ganglia on Monday February 05, 2024 @09:08PM
(#39269917)
In a universe where every action has an equal and opposite reaction, why not make those reactions argue about it?
You don't see a problem with trying to accelerate with two exhaust streams at 180ΒΊ to each other?