Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may have been exploited'

Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha... by londons_explore on Sunday February 04, 2024 @07:31PM (#39256023)

I think this is just a side effect of the fact the Darwin kernel isn't sufficiently low latency to ensure pass through feels 'real' enough.

Therefore the data path from camera to screen has to entirely happen without the kernels involvement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha... by judge2020 on Sunday February 04, 2024 @08:18PM (#39256257)

I feel like the small passthrough delay was slightly noticeable upon first use, but with motion blur it was easy to get used to, and now I don't notice it whatsoever. If I had to guess, it feels like it's under 10ms.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha... by catchnear4321 on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @10:40AM (#39275501)

interesting pattern arising where the technical theory is getting push-back from real world experience.

> If I had to guess, it feels like it’s under 10ms.

too many miss the value in such a statement.

“feel.”

subjective, but also sublime.

it doesn’t need to meet a metric, it needs to match a vibe. the metric is an approximation, as backwards as it might seem.

[ Parent | on HN ]