Re:Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
by bsdpufferfish on Sunday February 04, 2024 @03:23PM
(#39254031)
except when you moved to C there was no corresponding increase in fixed time which you must spend on tool setup just to program
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
by jhardy54 on Sunday February 04, 2024 @03:31PM
(#39254113)
Yeah, it’s really great that compiling C is a straightforward endeavor that doesn’t require any tools, and definitely doesn’t depend on executables that generate or parse configuration files. I’m confident that no C developers have ever spent time on tool setup just to program.
Re:Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
by bsdpufferfish on Sunday February 04, 2024 @03:34PM
(#39254142)
gcc main.c
Of course tinkerers made some tools you can tinker with as time went on, but you don’t have to let those interfere with velocity, just like I will not be using configuration languages.
Re:Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
by jhardy54 on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @09:33AM
(#39274585)
Do you mind linking me to some large C projects that don’t use make/autotools/etc?
Re:Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
by bsdpufferfish on Friday February 09, 2024 @09:53AM
(#39315371)
stb libraries