Re:Fck-nat: The (f)easible (C)ost (k)onfigurable NAT
by fulafel on Saturday February 03, 2024 @05:44AM
(#39239148)
This. You then work to dig deeper into the vendor lock-in, to move your apps to use apparently cheaper AWS-only services, and if you're wily (or oblivious) you can report this as cost savings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.