News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fck-nat: The (f)easible (C)ost (k)onfigurable NAT. Parent comment

Re:Fck-nat: The (f)easible (C)ost (k)onfigurable NAT by RinTohsaka on Friday February 02, 2024 @11:24PM (#39237518)
See also:

https://ipv6.fail/domain?filter=sinners

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fck-nat: The (f)easible (C)ost (k)onfigurable NAT by dilyevsky on Saturday February 03, 2024 @01:34AM (#39238049)
Tbh this site is pretty misleading. Fastly and Cloudflare support ipv6 pretty well in their productы, it’s just that their marketing team apparently don’t care
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fck-nat: The (f)easible (C)ost (k)onfigurable NAT by diggan on Saturday February 03, 2024 @04:38PM (#39244999)
> Tbh this site is pretty misleading

The website is pretty explicit about that it's testing if a domain/website is available over IPv6 vs IPv4. Clicking on a website also sends you to https://ipv6.fail/domain/cloudflare.net/ where it's even more explicit what they're testing against. Wouldn't call it misleading exactly.

[ Parent | on HN ]