News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth: Ingrid Ro... by jdiff on Friday February 02, 2024 @03:12PM (#39233636)
My mental image is one of unelected, untouchable oligarchs taking actions that they're accountable to nobody for. That's far worse than Scrooge McDuck.
Re:Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth: Ingrid Ro... by dingnuts on Friday February 02, 2024 @03:18PM (#39233717)
So you're imagining President Xi and the House of Saud, I take it? As long as you aren't imagining someone like Elon Musk who is certainly accountable to his debtors and shareholders and Boards, then this can be viewed as a realistic take.

If you're talking about people like Elon Musk and Bill Gates who have giant wealth because of their investments in businesses, then arguing that they should have that wealth taken away would literally take money out of the coffers of businesses that are currently using that money for things like payroll.

The GP is correct -- these people are not sitting around on a vault of gold like McDuck. Their money is in the economy, doing stuff. That's what investments are. That's why investors exist, and why they get a cut of the profit for taking a risk and lending their money to industry.

Re:Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth: Ingrid Ro... by missedthecue on Friday February 02, 2024 @05:06PM (#39235096)
That's not the same thing as hoarding. It's always the case that the wealth of even unelected untouchable oligarchs is comprised of productive assets, not hoarded in a secret pile.