Re:The EPA is proposing that 'forever chemicals' be consider...
by efitz on Friday February 02, 2024 @02:27PM
(#39233035)
I said cost be benefits - it’s now clear that the costs of many usages of lead and asbestos outweighed the benefits. I’m suggesting we look at both sides before we make a decision. Doesn’t seem like an extreme position.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The EPA is proposing that 'forever chemicals' be consider...
by rqtwteye on Friday February 02, 2024 @07:55PM
(#39236567)
The cost and benefits need to be carried by the same people. Right now with a lot of pollution some people have to pay the price for the benefits of others. Or often the whole population has to suffer damage because some capitalists get richer.