News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on You Shouldn't Start with an SPA. Parent comment

Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by paxys on Friday February 02, 2024 @01:40PM (#39232453)
Ok sure, but 99% of applications out there do not fit this description.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by simonhamp on Friday February 02, 2024 @01:46PM (#39232531)
If you're building an SPA that's identical to a native app, I think someone in the exec team is making poor decisions

Either make a web app or a native app... don't do both

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by paxys on Friday February 02, 2024 @01:48PM (#39232564)
The only difference between a browser-based (or Electron) SPA and a native app is which runtime and rendering engine you are using. Why would API calls to the backend be different in either case?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by simonhamp on Friday February 02, 2024 @01:54PM (#39232649)
Sure. But we're talking about needing the same API for two separate clients...

That infers building both and I'm questioning why you would build both if they're identical. Just build one and get your users to use it

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by paxys on Friday February 02, 2024 @01:57PM (#39232692)
Look around..no one is building native clients for every desktop OS anymore. Web, iOS and Android are the way to go for modern apps.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You Shouldn't Start with an SPA by simonhamp on Friday February 02, 2024 @02:03PM (#39232767)
Yeh... and if you've got iOS and Android covered, then web is a different thing. Doesn't need to be an SPA, can still use those same APIs if that makes sense for your app
[ Parent | on HN ]