Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by EasyMark on Thursday February 01, 2024 @10:27PM
(#39224641)
In a way, but now you can make sure your bot's racist post makes it to the top for $8 a month
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by tourmalinetaco on Thursday February 01, 2024 @10:40PM
(#39224721)
True; before that you simply had to be “notable”, whatever that meant.
Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by TeMPOraL on Friday February 02, 2024 @12:44AM
(#39225496)
Spending $10 one time with one of many companies that sold likes, follows, retweets, etc. for peanuts.
Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by sehansen on Friday February 02, 2024 @04:16AM
(#39226752)
No, before Elon the blue tick was just a blue tick next to your name. Now posts by blue ticks are also sorted before other posts in the interface.
Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by TeMPOraL on Friday February 02, 2024 @04:45AM
(#39226894)
Before Elon, posts on Twitter were sorted and hidden at the whim of engagement-maximizing algorithm. After Elon, the same is the case, maybe with the same tweak to the algorithm.
I thought the idea that timeline sorting order on social media sites is deterministic or scrutable to the viewer is long dead by now - it's not been the case for at least a good decade now!
Re:'Stupid,' 'shameful:' Tech workers on Y Combinator CEO Ga...
by rsynnott on Friday February 02, 2024 @06:25AM
(#39227473)
While that's true, the thing where ~all bluetick replies are promoted above ~all normal replies is a post-Musk 'innovation'. Stupid idea; there's 25 years of experience showing that pay-for-attention is corrosive to social sites (dating/hookup sites have been trying to make it work basically forever, and have generally ended up having to ration it).