News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by jbyers on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @11:42PM (#392486)
This strikes me as a top ten list searching for content. It's a shotgun-blast of advice: there's a big hole in the wall but it's not clear if there was a target.

If HN were to have a programmatic dampening of "top N list" submission ratings, I would not complain.

Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by thomasmallen on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @08:40PM (#392240)
Pft. Can't stand this guy's stuff -- it's unadulterated linkbait. Thank god we don't have FreelanceSwitch articles popping up in here yet.
Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by brm on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @09:08PM (#392279)
I'll agree with that, no need to knock what others are doing in making the suggestion though, but you're right, he could have at least added some of his own content
Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by drwh0 on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @11:45PM (#392490)
just remember that the single most impactful, game-changing, and profitable revolution in web uis in the last ten years was the dramatic simplicity of the google homepage...DESIGNED BY TWO UNIX SYSTEMS HACKERS!
Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by netcan on Wednesday December 10, 2008 @01:37AM (#392575)
I wonder if this is a fact or a fiction.

The legend of the Simple Google Interface.

Not saying it's not true. But are we sure we have a cause-effect here? Sure it worked, it was liked. Bu if they had a different UI, would they be nowhere now?

Re:10 Principles of the UI Design Masters by litewulf on Wednesday December 10, 2008 @03:38AM (#392657)
I think it helped. It wasn't the ONLY factor (the search engine was pretty good too ;)), but I think displaying results faster (smaller page size, more focused UI), contributes positively to the experience.

Perhaps there are UIs that would have resulted in faster growth or more total marketshare, but there are definitely UIs that would have made things far worse. I think the "headroom" for growth is pretty low, there were so many competing services then, if you can remember, that I find it hard to believe that there was only Google with a different looking interface.