Re:OpenBSD 5.1 released
by JoachimSchipper on Wednesday May 02, 2012 @02:01AM
(#3917809)
One reason to run OpenBSD: pf/altq and OpenBGPD/OpenOSPFD are mostly developed there, and the other BSDs tend to have older versions.
NetBSD is the one whose source you should study.
Why not OpenBSD?
Re:OpenBSD 5.1 released
by fusiongyro on Wednesday May 02, 2012 @09:52AM
(#3919018)
Because NetBSD's first priority is clean and correct code and it is often used for exactly this purpose.
Have you seen OpenBSD code? It's no less cleaner, and maybe even better in this regard.
Re:OpenBSD 5.1 released
by fusiongyro on Thursday May 03, 2012 @03:17AM
(#3922752)
Have you seen FreeBSD/NetBSD code? It's no less secure. :)
NetBSD is the one whose source you should study. The emphasis is on correctness and portability. The book Code Reading by Diomidis Spinellis used mainly examples from NetBSD even though he is a FreeBSD developer, because (he implies) the code is easier to read.
OpenBSD forked first and developed a reason to exist second; its storied past is really quite an interesting read, but won't leave you feeling like it is being developed by the greatest minds in security for exactly that purpose. I think its secure reputation is more fiat than fact and I'd like to see recent benchmarks substantiating the notion that it is better to run on routers and whatnot. I have no use for it.