Re:Robotic "Companions" Are Testing the Scope of Privacy and...
by fluoridation on Monday January 29, 2024 @10:39AM
(#39177494)
If it's viral, how can you tell it's from the e-cigarettes and not a direct human-to-human infection?
Re:Robotic "Companions" Are Testing the Scope of Privacy and...
by therealpygon on Monday January 29, 2024 @11:30AM
(#39178267)
As said, another example of cherry-picking. They smoked a vape, therefore it must be vapes. They got the vaccine, therefore it must be vaccines. Rinse and repeat for whichever argument.
What is worse, pointing out these selective facts generally makes people become defensive, so they dive into searching for more cherry-picked arguments as ammunition to prove themselves right, rather than accepting that they might actually be wrong and objectively looking for information. It is the core of the problem of politics on both sides and we can easily see how extreme it can make people regardless of the thing being advocated.
Cherry-picking and self-reinforcement go hand-in-hand.
So yeah, not really the point of your argument, but fuck e-cigarettes, for the rest of time I will have this stance. And yes, I am brutally aware of what cigarettes do as well, but don't knock the "theoretical" effects of e-cigarettes.