Please stop cargo culting this.
> “Verifiers SHOULD NOT require memorized secrets to be changed arbitrarily (e.g., periodically). However, verifiers SHALL force a change if there is evidence of compromise of the authenticator.”
They also don't recommend having rules about like, a certain number of symbols, etc.
To explain the other side of the comment, "cargo cult security" refers to some groups of tribal people in New Guinea who build giant wooden airplanes and control towers in the hopes of attracting airplanes delivering food[1][2].
It's very common in the security space for people who have zero understanding of underlying security models to build elaborate structures that kind of look like and feel like they're doing security, but it's actually providing no value. These practices get blindly passed on for decades despite all the best effort of actual experts to explain to them why the practices are, in fact, completely useless. Password rotation is a mindbogglingly persistent one, as described in the other comment.
So many people these days seem to completely forget that not everything is in the cloud, and there are many services in a company that you don’t see as a regular user or developer.
There is really nothing exciting in that part of cybersecurity and with the above in place you are safe and can move towards the real risks. Online password cracking does not matter in practical terms and for offline one you have other problems to urgently address.
What are these risks depends on who you are but if you address aggressive, stubborn and coercive patching + development security (if you develop) + enthusiastic awareness you are ahead of 99% of the world already.
Add to this some endpoint protection and monitoring of the events and, man, you are a company I can trust my HN rep.