News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA. Parent comment

Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by Alpha3031 on Saturday January 27, 2024 @06:46AM (#39154770)
Fortunately for EU regulators, US judicial precedent is not binding there while their Digital Markets Act is. We'll see if they take this lying down.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by GeekyBear on Saturday January 27, 2024 @12:08PM (#39157380)
Given treaties between the EU and US, I doubt the EU will be able to strip companies of their intellectual property rights.

We'll see.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by mpweiher on Monday January 29, 2024 @03:42AM (#39174147)
That's not how intellectual property works.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by GeekyBear on Monday January 29, 2024 @10:12AM (#39177133)
Getting paid when others use your intellectual property is exactly how intellectual property works.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by mpweiher on Tuesday January 30, 2024 @03:52AM (#39187821)
"Intellectual property" is a right granted by states in order to further specific goals of the state.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple's Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA by GeekyBear on Tuesday January 30, 2024 @10:55AM (#39191576)
"Treaties" are binding agreements between nations that place limits on what they may or may not do.

Fun fact: The EU itself is based on treaties between it's member states.

[ Parent | on HN ]