News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:.NET Framework Version Comparision by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @07:41AM (#3913852)
.NET is very "enterprisey". It seems to be designed to make creating line-of-business applications easier.
Re:.NET Framework Version Comparision by hamidpalo on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @08:59AM (#3914071)
What exactly makes it enterprisey? I am always really unclear on what makes something "enterprisey" other than perceptions.
Re:.NET Framework Version Comparision by powertower on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @09:24AM (#3914178)
IMO, complete integration (one solution, one vendor) across the board (from OS, to IDE, to Database, to Frameworks, etc) is what makes something "enterprisey". That, and a large and mature ecosystem built around it.
Re:.NET Framework Version Comparision by hamidpalo on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @10:00AM (#3914317)
But that's not true. Plenty of .NET users do use other OSs (through Mono) and databases (I use MySQL). Sure, the best IDE is VS and there's tons more docs and support on using it all on Windows, but the same can be said of Rails with Linux and Textmate for example.

Enterprisey is a matter of perception and shouldn't be a slur.

Re:.NET Framework Version Comparision by jinushaun on Wednesday May 02, 2012 @03:31PM (#3920722)
If you step outside of the startup bubble, you'll find that the bulk of .NET stuff is boring line-of-business apps developed by large corporations using the MS stack from top to bottom because MS is "safer" than open source.

I actually work at a .NET startup doing non-traditional things with .NET and we have the hardest time hiring new developers because of the "enterprisey" nature of .NET and the type of developer that generates.